|
POST
AWARD CHANGES AND APPROVALS
When And How To Get
Prior Approval
In general, approval of a budget by a
sponsoring agency constitutes prior approval for the performance of
activities and the expenditure of funds as detailed in the budget. Most
agencies will allow the grantee to depart from the original budget
provided that:
- The expenditures are necessary to the
successful completion of the project;
- The expenditures are allowable under
the governing cost principles and grantor policies and;
- Prior approval is obtained when
required.
Note that prior approval is a sponsor
function, but NSF, USDA, NASA, NIH and ADAMHA and others have delegated
most prior approvals to the University.
In addition, agency approval may also be
necessary for changes including, but not limited to, the following:
- A change in the scope or the
objectives of the project
- An increase in the funding
- A change in the principal
investigator, other key personnel, or the addition of subawardees
- A change in the budget that is not
covered by the rebudgeting authority originally granted by the
sponsor
- A change in the performance period
Prior Approval
Procedures/Budget Reallocation
Budget Reallocation (re-budgeting)
within a sponsored program, after it is awarded, is allowed if there is
a legitimate need to change budgeted costs, provided the reallocation
conforms to the sponsoring agency’s guidelines and is consistent with
the University’s policies and procedures. Budget reallocation is not
allowed for the purpose of relieving financial pressure on a
department’s unrestricted budget, or on other sponsored projects to
assign costs that could not otherwise be assigned.
The principal investigator may complete
the Budget
Reallocation Request Sponsored Programs Form addressing the
following points:
-
a cost estimate of the change and
the budget categories that will be altered;
-
the need for the change in relation
to the scientific progress or training effectiveness of the program;
-
why funds are available to be
transferred to another budget category;
-
whether the re-budgeting will have
any significant effect on the scientific or educational direction of
the project;
for travel, a statement of how the
travel will directly benefit the project and;
-
for equipment, a listing of each
piece of equipment, noting whether it is for general purpose or
special purpose, and how it will be used.
BUDGET reallocations are allowed
for sponsored programs. Budget reallocation entries must be
completed through budget request.
User must ensure that Facilities and Administrative costs (F&A or
indirect costs) are appropriately calculated for each adjustment if
required. Entries without proper F&A costs will be reversed and
must be resubmitted.
The following are guidelines for calculating F&A costs.
- Review the award notice to determine if F&A costs are
included and the required F&A rate.
-
When F&A costs are included in the award, the
relationship between direct cost base and F&A costs must remain the
same as provided in the award notice. The maximum recovery of
facilities and administrative costs must not change.
-
When F&A costs are calculated based on modified total
direct cost (MTDC), the following categories are applicable budget
reallocation.
MTDC
excludes the following object codes
Patient Care
Tuition
Rent
Equipment
- The reallocating direct costs from one of the excluded
direct categories, additional F&A costs must be rebudgeted.
Example: Rebudgeting $1,000 from equipment to other contractual
services with a 50% F&A rate.
Direct costs $1,000/1.50 = $667
F&A Costs $1,000 - $667 = $333 (object
code 8711)
- When reallocating $667 from the MTDC category to an excluded
direct cost category such as equipment, F&A costs are reduced by
$333 which may be rebudgeted to the Non-MTDC (equipment) category.
-
When reallocating budget from a MTDC budget category to
another MTDC category, no F&A cost budget change is required.
-
When F&A costs are calculated based on total direct costs,
there are no exclusions; therefore, no change in F&A is required.
In the event the index
has a deficit balance at index closeout, whether resulting from the budget reallocation,
an indirect cost adjustment or other transactions, the department
overhead index will be charged for the deficit unless the department
promptly identifies a funding source for the deficit.
If it is necessary to re-budget for
administrative and clerical costs after receiving the sponsored programs
award, the following conditions should be met:
- A written justification is prepared
which is equivalent to the justification that would have been
included in the original proposal.
- The Dean or the Dean’s designee
gives approval.
- Justification and approval are to be
maintained on file in the Grants and Contracts Accounting office.
Click here for more information.
Treatment
of Administrative and Clerical Costs
How to Get Agency
Approval
The principal investigator should
prepare a letter to the sponsoring agency including the following
information:
cost estimate of the change;
the need for the change in relation
to the scientific program or training effectiveness of project;
the budgetary categories which will
be altered and,
any significant effect the change
will have on the scientific or educational direction of the project.
The principal investigator should
obtain the countersignature from Sponsored Programs Administration.
Prior approval requirements for the
various sponsoring agencies are subject to change; the Office of
Sponsored Programs Administration should be contacted for current
information.
Failure to Obtain Prior
Approval
Failure to obtain prior approval for
all actions requiring such approval may result in the disallowance of
costs. Retroactive approval is allowed in highly unusual or exceptional
circumstances, and when denying such approval would affect in a material
manner the successful performance of the project objective. Authorized
officials granting retroactive approval shall be held responsible for
providing documentation for the grant file regarding the reasons why
prior approval was not obtained in a timely manner, the manner in which
the project objectives would be adversely affected if approval was
withheld, and a certification that approval would have been given had
the request been submitted on time.
Return to
Top of Page

|